Practitioners in Europe and the U.S. recently have proposed two distinct approaches to address what they believe are shortcomings of traditional budgeting practices. One approach advocates improving the budgeting process and primarily focuses on the planning problems with budgeting. The other advocates abandoning the budget and primarily focuses on the performance evaluation problems with budgeting. This paper provides an overview and research perspective on these two recent developments. We discuss why practitioners have become dissatisfied with budgets, describe the two distinct approaches, place them in a research context, suggest insights that may aid the practitioners, and use the practitioner perspectives to identify fruitful areas for research.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2003
Research Article|
January 01 2003
Practice Developments in Budgeting: An Overview and Research Perspective
Stephen C. Hansen;
Stephen C. Hansen
aThe George Washington University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Wim A. Van der Stede
Wim A. Van der Stede
cUniversity of Southern California.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-8033
Print ISSN: 1049-2127
American Accounting Association
2003
Journal of Management Accounting Research (2003) 15 (1): 95–116.
Citation
Stephen C. Hansen, David T. Otley, Wim A. Van der Stede; Practice Developments in Budgeting: An Overview and Research Perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1 December 2003; 15 (1): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2003.15.1.95
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00