ABSTRACT: This study closes the circle on a series of studies which have examined cross‐cultural differences in the likelihood of sharing information in a situation where an error has been made. Building on the work of Chow et al. (1999), Chow et al. (2000), Salter and Schulz (2005), and Salter et al. (2008) it seeks to control for collectivism and test the effect of face by using nations that are quite similar in terms of collectivism, but at opposite ends of the face dimension. It finds that Chinese managers are less willing to share negative information when the supervisor is present than Chilean managers. Once the supervisor is removed there is no significant difference in the information sharing pattern of these two cultures. We attribute the results to the effect of “face” in the Chinese culture, which suppresses information sharing willingness in Chinese managers when the supervisor is present and is not a facet of the Chilean culture.
Revaluating Face: A Note on Differences in Private Information Sharing Between Two Communitarian Societies
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Axel K.‐D. Schulz, Stephen B. Salter, Juan Claudio Lopez, Philip A. Lewis; Revaluating Face: A Note on Differences in Private Information Sharing Between Two Communitarian Societies. Journal of International Accounting Research 1 January 2009; 8 (1): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2009.8.1.57
Download citation file: