Heflin, Moon, and Wallace (2016; hereafter, HMW) are an excellent addition to the inaugural issue of the Journal of Financial Reporting (JFR) for at least two reasons. First, as I explain below, I believe the article provides important evidence about whether and how disclosure quality and earnings quality convey capital market benefits in the form of reduced capital costs and increased market liquidity. Second, I consider the paper to be an exemplar of one of the manuscript types explicitly encouraged in JFR's editorial policy, which reads: “Replications include a partial or comprehensive repeat of an experiment that sustains as many conditions as possible but uses a different sample. The sample employed in the replication should be at least as ‘strong’ as the original sample. JFR also uses the term ‘Replication’ to describe an archival empirical analysis that primarily performs the same analysis as an existing study,...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Spring 2016
Research Article|
March 01 2016
Commentary On: A Re-Examination of the Cost of Capital Benefits from Higher-Quality Disclosures
Michael Welker
Michael Welker
Queen's University
Search for other works by this author on:
I thank my long-time and very valued colleague Daniel Thornton for helpful suggestions for this Commentary.
Editor's note: Accepted by Catherine M. Schrand.
Online ISSN: 2380-2146
Print ISSN: 2380-2154
American Accounting Association
2016
Journal of Financial Reporting (2016) 1 (1): 97–99.
Citation
Michael Welker; Commentary On: A Re-Examination of the Cost of Capital Benefits from Higher-Quality Disclosures. Journal of Financial Reporting 1 March 2016; 1 (1): 97–99. https://doi.org/10.2308/jfir-51352
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00