ABSTRACT: The paper describes a continuous monitoring methodology in an environment with multiple cues indicative of fraud and errors. A case study describes an application by a restaurant franchisor on the monthly sales numbers reported by franchisees. The system scores each restaurant based on variables judged to be possible indicators of fraud or errors in the monthly sales reports. The variables are weighted according to their perceived importance to obtain a final risk score for each restaurant. The output is a small set of audit targets believed to have a high risk of reporting errors. The variables can be categorized as being (1) key performance indicators, (2) statistical irregularities, (3) motivation or pressure related variables, and (4) variables related to compliance with the franchising agreement.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2008
Research Article|
January 01 2008
Using Key Performance Indicators and Risk Measures in Continuous Monitoring
Mark J. Nigrini;
Mark J. Nigrini
The College of New Jersey.
Search for other works by this author on:
Arlo J. Johnson
Arlo J. Johnson
Manager, Franchise Audit.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7940
Print ISSN: 1554-1908
American Accounting Association
2008
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting (2008) 5 (1): 65–80.
Citation
Mark J. Nigrini, Arlo J. Johnson; Using Key Performance Indicators and Risk Measures in Continuous Monitoring. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 1 December 2008; 5 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta.2008.5.1.65
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00