These solutions are suggested responses that reflect publicly available information related to the error.1 Students may find other and/or different information (e.g., updated controls) that support an appropriate answer. We encourage instructors to give credit for other answers that are thoughtful and supported by evidence. In Appendix B, we provide an example case rubric where the assignment is worth 25 points. Points are generally allocated evenly across questions. The instructors who piloted this case focused their grading on depth and coherency of thought, but instructors may choose to put more weight on other aspects of the deliverable, such as writing proficiency. We encourage instructors to assign a total point value and point allocation structure that is consistent with their grading preferences.2
Your instructor will indicate whether this is a group, individual, or in-class assignment. While the error took place in the United States, the case concepts are...
