This case introduces students to engagement planning, risk management, independence, and execution in the setting of attestation engagements by examining the auditor’s role in the Academy Awards (also “the Oscars”). Specifically, this case focuses on an error made by PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) during the 89 th Academy Awards ceremony in 2017, which resulted in the announcement of the wrong “Best Picture” winner (“the error”). Students are required to research attestation engagements and the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, analyze the benefits and risks associated with the Oscars engagement, evaluate the controls that were in place, and think critically about what additional control considerations may have prevented the error. Finally, students are asked to assess the potential consequences of this error for the engagement partners, the firm, and its clients. The visibility of this error is a unique opportunity to evaluate the roles and responsibilities of accountants in practice.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 22 2022
Risk and Control Considerations in Attestation Engagements The Auditor’s Role in the Academy Awards
Marc Cussatt
;
Marc Cussatt
Clemson University
School of Accountancy
1031 Berkeley Drive
UNITED STATES
Clemson
SC
29631
Search for other works by this author on:
Kim Westermann
Kim Westermann
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
April 26 2021
Revision Received:
December 22 2021
Accepted:
March 28 2022
Online Issn: 1558-7983
Print Issn: 0739-3172
2022
Issues in Accounting Education (2022)
Citation
Adam Bordeman, Marc Cussatt, Kim Westermann; Risk and Control Considerations in Attestation Engagements The Auditor’s Role in the Academy Awards. Issues in Accounting Education 2022; https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2021-036
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00
5
Views