ABSTRACT: Federal regulations require oversight of federally sponsored research involving human subjects. Universities have responded by forming Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Although these regulations only apply to federally funded projects, universities have extended the oversight to include all projects involving human subjects. From our own experience, we observe that not all accounting faculty are aware of their responsibilities to their local boards. The sanctions for failing to follow required procedures depend on the infraction, and range from an order to cease work on the project to termination of university service for the faculty member and expulsion for the student. This report helps accounting faculty understand how the review process may affect their role as instructors and serves as encouragement to them to become familiar with the requirements of local review boards.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2009
Research Article|
February 01 2009
IRB Creep: Federal Regulations Protecting Human Research Subjects and Increasing Instructors' Responsibilities
Diane A. Riordan, Professor;
Diane A. Riordan, Professor
James Madison University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael P. Riordan, Professor
Michael P. Riordan, Professor
James Madison University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online Issn: 1558-7983
Print Issn: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
2009
Issues in Accounting Education (2009) 24 (1): 31–43.
Citation
Diane A. Riordan, Michael P. Riordan; IRB Creep: Federal Regulations Protecting Human Research Subjects and Increasing Instructors' Responsibilities. Issues in Accounting Education 1 February 2009; 24 (1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.1.31
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00