The business press is showering criticism on business academics, citing failure to teach relevant skills to students and a perceived increasing irrelevance of research streams. This criticism is echoed by some academics who assert the need for serious consideration of the academy's direction. In this essay, we examine and extend this body of criticism and explore its implications for accounting research and education. We discuss how our discipline has freely borrowed methodology from the physical sciences and how this importation has led to the adoption of excessively simplified economic theories. We also consider the self‐fulfilling attribute of social science theories and how this attribute has led to formulations of behavioral models, instantiation of those models in the business environment, and eventual conformity of manager behavior related to the underlying assumptions of these models. We then examine agency theory in light of this dynamic and explore how the discipline‐wide espousal of this theory may have led our accounting education system to unwittingly introduce and then normalize narrowly self‐interested behavior. Finally, we suggest ways to improve accounting education that embrace multiple perspectives for preparing students to act truly in the public interest.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2006
Research Article|
February 01 2006
Rethinking the Influence of Agency Theory in the Accounting Academy
Jeffrey R. Cohen, Associate Professor;
Jeffrey R. Cohen, Associate Professor
Boston College.
Search for other works by this author on:
Lori L. Holder‐Webb, Assistant Professor
Lori L. Holder‐Webb, Assistant Professor
University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7983
Print ISSN: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
2006
Issues in Accounting Education (2006) 21 (1): 17–30.
Citation
Jeffrey R. Cohen, Lori L. Holder‐Webb; Rethinking the Influence of Agency Theory in the Accounting Academy. Issues in Accounting Education 1 February 2006; 21 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2006.21.1.17
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00