The purpose of the BuyGasCo Corporation (BuyGasCo) case is to introduce and evaluate the use of different costing systems as evidence in a predatory pricing lawsuit. The setting of this case is a major chain of retail motor fuel (gasoline) service centers, which has been accused of selling regular gasoline below cost (as defined under Florida state statutes). The judge accepted the volume‐based method used by the plaintiff and issued an injunction disallowing BuyGasCo from selling regular gasoline below cost as concluded in the plaintiff's report. BuyGasCo retained an accounting professor from the local university as an expert witness for the defense to determine if activity‐based costing (ABC) analysis would provide grounds for a possible appeal of the judge's ruling.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 November 2005
Research Article|
November 01 2005
BuyGasCo Corporation: The Use of Alternative Costing Methods in a Predatory Pricing Lawsuit
John B. MacArthur, Professor;
John B. MacArthur, Professor
University of North Florida.
Search for other works by this author on:
Rebecca L. Moore
Rebecca L. Moore
Audit and Risk Advisory Services with KPMG LLP.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7983
Print ISSN: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
2005
Issues in Accounting Education (2005) 20 (4): 341–357.
Citation
Thomas L. Barton, John B. MacArthur, Rebecca L. Moore; BuyGasCo Corporation: The Use of Alternative Costing Methods in a Predatory Pricing Lawsuit. Issues in Accounting Education 1 November 2005; 20 (4): 341–357. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2005.20.4.341
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00