This case provides a rich environment in which students can explore the challenges of applying Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Investments, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. By focusing on the stock performance of two technology firms, Lucent Technologies and Microsoft, the case exposes students to issues of determining when a stock price decline is other than temporary, the effects of timing on accounting reporting decisions, and the role of the auditor in determining fair financial reporting. The case provides a qualitative and quantitative application of the two standards that is more complex and less structured than that provided by an intermediate financial accounting text. The case also demonstrates that comprehensive income, unlike net income, is relatively stable and difficult to manipulate.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 May 2005
Research Article|
May 01 2005
Lucent Loses Its Luster: Accounting for Investments Turned Bad
Teresa P. Gordon, Associate Professor;
Teresa P. Gordon, Associate Professor
Search for other works by this author on:
Marcia S. Niles, Professor
Marcia S. Niles, Professor
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7983
Print ISSN: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
2005
Issues in Accounting Education (2005) 20 (2): 183–193.
Citation
Teresa P. Gordon, Marcia S. Niles; Lucent Loses Its Luster: Accounting for Investments Turned Bad. Issues in Accounting Education 1 May 2005; 20 (2): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2005.20.2.183
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00