This study tested the relative efficiency of teaching material presented in the worked examples form of instruction compared to problem‐solving exercises. Tests were also conducted to determine if subjects' prior exposure to accounting instruction affects results. Teaching materials were developed in Computer‐Based Learning (CBL) format for one introductory accounting topic completed by 93 subjects. Response measures included test performance, learning effort, and instructional efficiency consisting of the combined measured performance and learning effort. The study results indicate that worked examples were more efficient than problem‐solving exercises for students with no prior knowledge of accounting, while being equally efficient for those with prior knowledge.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2005
Research Article|
February 01 2005
Empirical Evidence on the Relative Efficiency of Worked Examples versus Problem‐Solving Exercises in Accounting Principles Instruction
Abdel K. Halabi;
Abdel K. Halabi
Monash University Gippsland Campus.
Search for other works by this author on:
Juhani E. Tuovinen, Associate Professor;
Juhani E. Tuovinen, Associate Professor
Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education.
Search for other works by this author on:
Alan A. Farley, Professor
Alan A. Farley, Professor
Monash University Caulfield Campus.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7983
Print ISSN: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
2005
Issues in Accounting Education (2005) 20 (1): 21–32.
Citation
Abdel K. Halabi, Juhani E. Tuovinen, Alan A. Farley; Empirical Evidence on the Relative Efficiency of Worked Examples versus Problem‐Solving Exercises in Accounting Principles Instruction. Issues in Accounting Education 1 February 2005; 20 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2005.20.1.21
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00