General Electric, Matell, NationsBank, and W. R. Grace are among companies recently under scrutiny for managing their earnings. This case uses a fictitious data set to simulate a decision environment in which earnings are managed in the context of accounting for investments in marketable securities. Decisions are made from the perspective of management interests and other stakeholders, the FASB's conceptual framework, and GAAP. These competing interests may lead to inconsistent conclusions. As a result, proper analysis of the issues and framing of defensible positions requires more than application of professional accounting standards. Resolution of conflicts of interest is made using appropriate ethical analysis based upon a philosophical framework of Utilitarian‐Theory, Rights‐Theory and Justice‐Theory.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 November 1999
Research Article|
November 01 1999
Earnings Management and Ethical Decision Making: Choices In Accounting for Security Investments
Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., Professor;
Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., Professor
University of Southern Mississippi.
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Terry Grant, Associate Professor
C. Terry Grant, Associate Professor
University of Southern Mississippi.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7983
Print ISSN: 0739-3172
American Accounting Association
1999
Issues in Accounting Education (1999) 14 (4): 613–640.
Citation
Chauncey M. DePree, C. Terry Grant; Earnings Management and Ethical Decision Making: Choices In Accounting for Security Investments. Issues in Accounting Education 1 November 1999; 14 (4): 613–640. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.1999.14.4.613
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00