SUMMARY: Recently, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB” or “Board”) issued a release to address, in two ways, issues relating to the responsibilities of a registered public accounting firm and its supervisory personnel with respect to supervision. First, the release reminds registered firms and associated persons of, and highlights the scope of, Section 105(c)(6) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“the Act”), which authorizes the Board to impose sanctions on registered public accounting firms and their supervisory personnel for failing to supervise reasonably an associated person who has violated certain laws, rules, or standards. Second, the release discusses and seeks comment on conceptual approaches to rulemaking that might complement the application of Section 105(c)(6) and, through increased accountability, lead to improved supervision practices and, consequently, improved audit quality. The PCAOB provided for a 91-day exposure period (from August 5, 2010, to November 3, 2010) for interested parties to examine and provide comments on the conceptual approaches to rulemaking that might complement the application of Section 105(c)(6). The Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association provided the comments in the letter below to the PCAOB on the PCAOB Release No. 2010-005, Application of the “Failure to Supervise” Provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Solicitation of Comment on Rulemaking Concepts.

Agoglia
C. P.
,
J. F.
Brazel
,
R. C.
Hatfield
, and
S. B.
Jackson
.
2010
.
How do audit workpaper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads?
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
29
(
2
):
27
43
.
Brazel
J. F.
,
C. P.
Agoglia
, and
R. C.
Hatfield
.
2004
.
Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance
.
The Accounting Review
79
(
4
):
949
966
.
Lambert, T. A., J. F. Brazel, and K. L. Jones. 2010 . Unintended consequences of accelerated filings: Are mandatory reductions in audit delay associated with reductions in earnings quality? Working paper , University of Massachusetts . Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=963402 .
Loscalzo, M. 1991 . Quality review—One year after . The CPA Journal (June): Available at: http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/old/10917116.htm .
Payne
E. A.
,
R. J.
Ramsay
, and
E. M.
Bamber
.
2010
.
The effect of alternative types of review on auditors' procedures and performance
.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
29
(
1
):
207
220
.
This content is only available via PDF.