SUMMARY: Recently, the Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC) of the AICPA released an exposure draft proposing changes in professional standards regarding release of client data. The proposal would prohibit disclosure of “confidential client information” to third parties without client permission, even if unidentifiable. This article outlines the comments of an American Accounting Association (AAA) Task Force convened to analyze the proposal. The Task Force was concerned that the proposed ruling would impede audit research and sharing of audit-process-related information about unidentified (and unidentifiable) clients in the classroom—either of which would be contrary to the interests of the profession and the public.
REFERENCES
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
2009
. Omnibus Proposal of Professional Ethics Division Interpretations and Rulings. Available at:
http://www.aicpa.org/download/ethics/Final_Ethics_Exposure_Draft_090209.pdf
.Bedard
J. C.
, and
Graham
L.
2002
. The effects of risk orientation, underlying risk and client experience on risk factor identification and audit test planning
. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
21
(2
): 39
–56
.Brown
C. E.
, and
Solomon
I.
1990
. Auditor configural information processing in control risk assessment
. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
9
(1
): 17
–38
.Hunton
J. E.
, and
Gold
A.
2010
. A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin and open discussion
. The Accounting Review
(forthcoming
).Kinney
W. R.
, Jr., and
Martin
R. D.
1994
. Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies
. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
13
(2
): 149
–157
.Plumlee
R. D.
,
Kachelmeier
S. J.
,
Madeo
S. A.
,
Pratt
J. H.
, and
Krull
G.
2006
. Assessing the shortage of accounting faculty
. Issues in Accounting Education
21
(2
): 113
–125
.Tan
H.-T.
, and
Trotman
K. T.
2003
. Reviewers responses to anticipated stylization attempts by preparers of audit workpapers
. The Accounting Review
78
(2
): 581
–604
.
This content is only available via PDF.
American Accounting Association
2010
