SUMMARY: Recent SASs (e.g., SAS No. 114 (AICPA 2006b) and SAS No. 115 (AICPA 2008a)) expand required and optional communications from auditors to their clients. Given that some state laws likely allow stockholders to request access to those communications, and given that the ASB and the IAASB currently are examining how the auditor’s report may be made more effective in communicating assurance to financial statement users, we propose expanding the current auditor’s report by adding a set of accompanying footnotes. The footnotes could include auditor comments on information about the audit, the quality of the financial statements, the quality of the financial reporting system, and/or the quality of the client as a business entity. We conclude with suggestions for research that would identify the effects of suggested communications on various stakeholders.
REFERENCES
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
1988
. The Auditor’s Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Statement on Auditing Standard No. 59
. New York, NY:
AICPA
.American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
2006a
. Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. Statement on Auditing Standard No. 107
. New York, NY:
AICPA
.American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
2006b
. The Auditor’s Communication with Those Charged with Governance. Statement on Auditing Standard No. 114
. New York, NY:
AICPA
.American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
2008a
. Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit. Statement on Auditing Standard No. 115
. New York, NY:
AICPA
.American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
.
2008b
. Code of Professional Conduct (Rule 301—Confidential Client Information). New York, NY:
AICPA
.Brody
R.
,
Lowe
D.
, and
Pany
K.
2003
. Could $51 million be immaterial when Enron reports income of $105 million?
Accounting Horizons
17
(2
):
153
–160
.Brody
S.
,
Weiss
L.
, and
Lubbock
J.
2008
. Protecting and controlling company documents in Delaware
. The National Law Journal
(November
). Available at:
http://www.law.com/jsp/PubArticle.jsp?id=1202426267075
.Brown
H.
, and
Wright
A.
2008
. Negotiation research in auditing
. Accounting Horizons
22
(1
):
91
–109
.Church
B.
,
Davis
S.
, and
McCracken
S.
2008
. The auditor’s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis
. Accounting Horizons
22
(1
):
69
–90
.De Martinis
M.
, and
Burrowes
A.
1996
. Materiality and risk judgements: A review of users’ expectations
. Managerial Finance
22
(9
):
16
–34
.Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
.
2010
. Project Update: Going Concern. Available at:
http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/FASBContent_C/ProjectUpdatePage&cid=900000011115
.Hatherly
D.
,
Brown
T.
, and
Innes
J.
1998
. Free-form reporting and perceptions of the audit
. The British Accounting Review
30
1
):
23
–38
.Innes
J.
,
Brown
T.
, and
Hatherly
D.
1997
. The expanded audit report—A research study within the development of SAS 600
. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
10
(5
):
702
–717
.Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)
.
2007
. Audit Quality Fundamentals—Auditor Reporting. London, U.K.:
ICAEW
.International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
.
2006
. Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement (ISA 315). New York, NY:
IAASB
.International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
.
2008
. Communications with Those Charged with Governance (ISA 260). New York, NY:
IAASB
.McEnroe
J.
, and
Martens
S.
2001
. Auditors’ and investors’ perceptions of the “expectation gap.”
Accounting Horizons
15
(4
):
345
–358
.Manson
S.
, and
Zamon
M.
2001
. Auditor communication in an evolving environment: Going beyond SAS 600 auditor’s reports of financial statements
. The British Accounting Review
33
(2
):
113
–136
.Mock
T.
,
Turner
J.
,
Gray
G.
, and
Coram
P.
(
MTGC
). 2009
. The Unqualified Auditor’s Report: A Study of User Perceptions, Effects on User Decisions and Decision Processes, and Directions for Future Research. An unpublished report to the Auditing Standards Board and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (June), New York, NY
.Monroe
G.
, and
Woodliff
D.
1994
. An empirical investigation of the audit expectation gap: Australian evidence
. Accounting and Finance
34
(1
):
47
–74
.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
.
2007
. An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements. Auditing Standard No. 5
. Washington, D.C.:
PCAOB
.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
.
2009
. Proposed Auditing Standards Related to the Auditor's Assessment of and Response to Risk and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards. Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 026
. Washington, D.C.:
PCAOB
.Turner
J.
1997
. The impact of materiality decisions on financial ratios—A computer simulation
. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance
12
(2
):
125
–147
.Turner
J.
2007
. Aligning auditor materiality choice and the needs of a reasonable person
. Journal of Forensic Accounting
VIII
(2
):
29
–52
.
This content is only available via PDF.
American Accounting Association
2010
