REFERENCES
Abbott
L. J.
,
Parker
S.
, and
Peters
G. F.
2004
. Audit committee characteristics and restatements
. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
23
(1
): 69
–87
.Bamber
E. M.
,
Carpenter
T.
, and
Hammersley
J. S.
2008
. The influence of documentation specificity and priming on auditors’ fraud risk assessments and evidence evaluation
. Available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090608
.Beasley
M. S.
,
Carcello
J. V.
, and
Hermanson
D.
1999
. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987–1997, An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. Jersey City, NJ:
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
.Brazel
J. F.
,
Jones
K. L.
, and
Zimbelman
M. F.
2007
. Using nonfinancial measures to assess fraud risk
. Available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=886545
.Carpenter
T.
, and
Reimers
J. L.
2009
. The effect of a partner’s emphasis on professional skepticism on auditors’ fraud judgments
. Available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1068942
.Houston
R. W.
,
Peters
M. F.
, and
Pratt
J. H.
1999
. The audit risk model, business risk and audit-planning decisions
. The Accounting Review
(3
): 281
–298
.Public Oversight Board (POB)
.
2000
. Panel on Audit Effectiveness: Report and Recommendations. Stamford, CT:
POB
.Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
.
1999
. Materiality. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99. Washington, D.C.:
SEC
.Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
.
2006
. Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108. Washington, D.C.:
SEC
.Zimbelman
M. F.
1997
. The effects of SAS No. 82 on auditors’ attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions
. Journal of Accounting Research
35
(Supplement
): 75
–97
.
This content is only available via PDF.
American Accounting Association
2009