SUMMARY: We present a timely practice-oriented case related to the inspection process of registered firms by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). This case allows auditing students an opportunity to explore the unique challenges that public accounting firms auditing U.S. public companies face with respect to the PCAOB inspection process. The case focuses on large and small registered firms (inspected annually and triennially, respectively) receiving an inspection report where the PCAOB identified certain matters considered to be audit deficiencies of such significance that the inspection team believed the audit firm did not obtain sufficient competent evidential matter to support the auditor’s opinion. The case exposes students to the PCAOB inspection process, highlights many deficiencies noted to date by the PCAOB inspectors, and emphasizes the importance of sufficient and appropriately documented audit evidence to support audit opinions. By reviewing ‘deficient’ inspection reports, students gain an appreciation for common audit deficiencies as well as the subjective nature of portions of the authoritative literature and the inspection process itself. The case reinforces students’ understanding of the practical matters involved in appropriately obtaining, evaluating, and documenting audit evidence, as well as educates students on the PCAOB inspection process in order to address important competencies required of Sarbanes-Oxley era audit professionals.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2009
Auditing the Auditors: A Case on PCAOB Inspection Reports of Registered Public Accounting Firms Free
American Accounting Association
2009
Current Issues in Auditing (2009) 3 (1): B1–B18.
Citation
Brian Daugherty, Marshall K. Pitman; Auditing the Auditors: A Case on PCAOB Inspection Reports of Registered Public Accounting Firms. Current Issues in Auditing 1 June 2009; 3 (1): B1–B18. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia.2009.3.1.B1
Download citation file: