Mitigating the Common Information Sampling Bias Inherent in Small‐Group Discussion (Retracted) | Citedby Results | Behavioral Research in Accounting | American Accounting Association

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Mitigating the Common Information Sampling Bias Inherent in Small‐Group Discussion (Retracted)

Behavioral Research in Accounting (2001) 13 (1): 171–194.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Manipulating a synchronous or separatist group orientation to improve performance on a hidden profile task

Miranda R. Kolb
Lyn M. van Swol

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2018) 21 (1): 57.

Self-regulation of the academic accounting literature: The case of James Hunton

Michele Meckfessel
Stephen Moehrle

Research in Accounting Regulation (2017) 29 (1): 10.

The Utilization of Quantitative and Qualitative Information in Groups' Capital Investment Decisions

Nicole P. Ang
Ken T. Trotman

Behavioral Research in Accounting (2015) 27 (1): 1.

Focus group methods: Using interactive and nominal groups to explore emerging technology-driven phenomena in accounting and information systems

Steve G. Sutton
Vicky Arnold

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems (2013) 14 (2): 81.

Halo Effect in Analytical Procedure: The Impact of Client’s Profile and Scope of Information

intiyas utami
Indra Wijaya Kusuma
Dr. Gudono
Dr. Supriyadi

SSRN Electronic Journal (2013)

The Effects of Incentives on Information Exchange and Decision Quality in Groups

Khim Kelly

Behavioral Research in Accounting (2010) 22 (1): 43.

Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias

Diane F. Baker

Journal of Management Education (2010) 34 (2): 249.

Procedural Instrumentality and Audit Group Judgment: An Exploration of the Impact of Cognitive Fallibility and Ability Differences

Gary Kleinman
Dan Palmon

Group Decision and Negotiation (2009) 18 (2): 147.

From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm

Gwen M. Wittenbaum
Andrea B. Hollingshead
Isabel C. Botero

Communication Monographs (2004) 71 (3): 286.

Comparing Audit Team Effectiveness via Alternative Modes of Computer-Mediated Communication

Uday S. Murthy
David S. Kerr

AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2004) 23 (1): 141.