Activity‐based cost management (ABCM) can provide improved information for strategic decisions such as product planning and cost management. While ABCM has been increasingly adopted there is evidence that, for some organizations, promised gains have not eventuated. It appears that the main difficulties in adopting ABCM derive from implementation issues rather than the technical design of the systems. This study examines the role of conflict in ABCM implementation. It is argued that attention to ABCM behavioral implementation enhances cognitive conflict that is then associated with successful ABCM applications, specifically the usefulness of ABCM for product planning and cost management. Lack of attention to these factors generates affective conflict that is associated with less successful applications. Results of an empirical study of 56 managers indicated that cognitive conflict intervenes between ABCM behavioral implementation factors and beneficial outcomes. However, while there were significant negative associations between affective conflict and beneficial outcomes, there were no significant associations between behavioral implementation factors and affective conflict.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2004
Research Article|
January 01 2004
The Role of Cognitive and Affective Conflict in Early Implementation of Activity‐Based Cost Management
Robert H. Chenhall
Robert H. Chenhall
Monash University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-8009
Print ISSN: 1050-4753
American Accounting Association
2004
Behavioral Research in Accounting (2004) 16 (1): 19–44.
Citation
Robert H. Chenhall; The Role of Cognitive and Affective Conflict in Early Implementation of Activity‐Based Cost Management. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1 February 2004; 16 (1): 19–44. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2004.16.1.19
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00