This study examines the relationship between elements of role stress and two important external auditor job outcome variables: job satisfaction and performance. The study extends prior research by examining the moderating influence of the Type A behavior pattern on these relationships. The need to re‐examine the linkages between the elements of role stress and both job satisfaction and job performance using theoretically based moderators, such as the Type A behavior pattern, has been highlighted in the role‐stress literature. Analysis of survey data confirmed that both role conflict and role ambiguity are significantly negatively associated with auditor job performance and job satisfaction. However, the expected moderating role of the Type A behavior pattern on the relationships between the components of role stress and job satisfaction and auditor job performance was not found. Interestingly, however, a direct positive relationship between the Type A behavior pattern and both job outcome variables was apparent. The latter result suggests that, among audit professionals, Type A individuals tend to outperform and be more satisfied with their employment than Type Bs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2001
Research Article|
January 01 2001
Role Stress, the Type A Behavior Pattern, and External Auditor Job Satisfaction and Performance
Richard T. Fisher
Richard T. Fisher
Lincoln University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-8009
Print ISSN: 1050-4753
American Accounting Association
2001
Behavioral Research in Accounting (2001) 13 (1): 143–170.
Citation
Richard T. Fisher; Role Stress, the Type A Behavior Pattern, and External Auditor Job Satisfaction and Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1 February 2001; 13 (1): 143–170. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.143
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00