This study examines the effects of gender and task complexity on the accuracy of audit judgments. Because research in cognitive psychology and marketing suggests that females may be more accurate decision makers in complex decision tasks, we hypothesize that there will be a significant interaction between gender and task complexity on the accuracy of an audit judgment. A 2×2 full factorial experiment (males/females by high‐/low‐task complexity) was carried out. The number and consistency of cues was manipulated to create the high‐ and low‐complexity conditions. Participants were required to judge whether an inventory balance was fairly presented based on case material that contained a material misstatement in the inventory account balance. The results support the hypothesis.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2001
Research Article|
January 01 2001
A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment
Gary S. Monroe
Gary S. Monroe
Edith Cowan University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-8009
Print ISSN: 1050-4753
American Accounting Association
2001
Behavioral Research in Accounting (2001) 13 (1): 111–125.
Citation
Janne Chung, Gary S. Monroe; A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1 February 2001; 13 (1): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00