In an exploratory study, we report how 140 auditors rate the relative importance of 25 risk factors (red flags) identified in SAS No. 82. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to produce a decision model for each subject, and mean decision models are reported for groups of subjects. The results indicate that management characteristics and influence over the control environment red flags were approximately twice as important as operating and financial stability characteristics red flags and about four times as important as industry conditions red flags. The three single most important red flags account for almost 40 percent of the total decision weight. A particularly interesting finding is that the mean decision models of 43 Big 5 auditors, 50 regional/localfirm auditors, and 47 internal auditors were not significantly different from each other.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2001
Research Article|
January 01 2001
The Relative Importance of Management Fraud Risk Factors
Barbara A. Apostolou;
Barbara A. Apostolou
Louisiana State University.
Search for other works by this author on:
John M. Hassell;
John M. Hassell
Indiana University Indianapolis.
Search for other works by this author on:
Sally A. Webber;
Sally A. Webber
Northern Illinois University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Glenn E. Sumners
Glenn E. Sumners
Louisiana State University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-8009
Print ISSN: 1050-4753
American Accounting Association
2001
Behavioral Research in Accounting (2001) 13 (1): 1–24.
Citation
Barbara A. Apostolou, John M. Hassell, Sally A. Webber, Glenn E. Sumners; The Relative Importance of Management Fraud Risk Factors. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1 February 2001; 13 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.1
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00