ABSTRACT: There are currently no statutory remedies for the double taxation of a taxpayer or transaction, only a judicial doctrine known as equitable recoupment. Equitable recoupment can be used by either a taxpayer or the government to avoid unjust enrichment caused by enforcement of the statute of limitations. It involves a single transaction subject to two different legal theories of taxation, a claim barred by the statute of limitations, and a sufficient identity of interest between the taxpayers. Until recently, equitable recoupment could be raised in District Court and the Court of Federal Claims, but the jurisdiction of the Tax Court in such matters was uncertain. The enactment of a new tax provision in 2006 allows taxpayers to avoid having to sue for a refund and enables them to seek relief in Tax Court. This is particularly helpful for taxpayers who do not have the resources to pay a tax and then file a claim for refund, especially in light of the new enforcement efforts on the part of the IRS. This article provides a judicial history of equitable recoupment, an explanation of the recent statutory change, and a discussion of the implications for taxpayers and tax practitioners.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2010
Research Article|
January 01 2010
Equitable Recoupment: Is It Finally Equitable? Available to Purchase
Janet Mosebach, Assistant Professor;
Janet Mosebach, Assistant Professor
University of Akron.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jerome E. Apple, Instructor;
Jerome E. Apple, Instructor
University of Akron.
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen Hanudel, JD/MTax Graduate Student
Stephen Hanudel, JD/MTax Graduate Student
University of Akron.
Search for other works by this author on:
American Accounting Association
2010
The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research (2010) 8 (1): 34–48.
Citation
Janet Mosebach, Jerome E. Apple, Stephen Hanudel; Equitable Recoupment: Is It Finally Equitable?. The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research 1 December 2010; 8 (1): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr.2010.8.1.34
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00
3
Views