The Relation between Consensus and Accuracy in Low‐to‐Moderate Accuracy Tasks: An Auditing Example | Citedby Results | AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory | American Accounting Association

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

The Relation between Consensus and Accuracy in Low‐to‐Moderate Accuracy Tasks: An Auditing Example

AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2000) 19 (1): 101–121.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Difference – or Deficiency – in Judgment? Evaluations of Auditors, and the Joint Effects of Approach Punitiveness and Wise Thinking Disposition

Tim Brown
Tracie McDonald Majors
Mark E. Peecher

SSRN Electronic Journal (2018)

Effect of Transaction Type on Consensus of Auditorss Decisions in IFRS Era

Taesup Shim
Su Jin Pae
Eugene Choi

SSRN Electronic Journal (2016)

An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions

Mark E. Peecher
Ira Solomon
Ken T. Trotman

Accounting, Organizations and Society (2013) 38 (8): 596.

Enhancing auditors' performance

Takiah Mohd Iskandar
Ria Nelly Sari
Zuraidah Mohd‐Sanusi
Rita Anugerah

Managerial Auditing Journal (2012) 27 (5): 462.

Reliability and Consensus of Experienced Wine Judges: Expertise Within and Between?

Robert H. Ashton

Journal of Wine Economics (2012) 7 (1): 70.

Audit Reviewers' Evaluation of Subordinates' Work Quality

Hun-Tong Tan
Premila Gowri Shankar

SSRN Electronic Journal (2009)

Auditors’ self-perceived abilities in conducting domain audits

Vincent Owhoso
Andrea Weickgenannt

Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2009) 20 (1): 3.

The impact of affective information on the professional judgments of more experienced and less experienced auditors

Sudip Bhattacharjee
Kimberly Moreno

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (2002) 15 (4): 361.