This study examines differences in audit committee member judgments before the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (“pre‐SOX”) versus after the act was passed (“post‐SOX”) as well as audit committee member perceptions of the effects of SOX. Based on experimental materials administered to 372 public company audit committee members (131 pre‐SOX from DeZoort et al. [2003a] and 241 post‐SOX), we find that audit committee support for an auditor‐proposed adjustment is significantly higher in the post‐SOX period. Additional analyses reveal that the effect of SOX differs between audit committee members who are CPAs versus non‐CPAs. Specifically, the greater audit committee member support for the proposed adjustment post‐SOX is attributable to members who are CPAs. In general, audit committee members in the post‐SOX period feel more responsible for resolving the accounting issue, perceive that audit committee members have greater expertise to evaluate the accounting issue, and also are more concerned with reporting accuracy and a need for conservative financial reporting than those in the pre‐SOX period. We also find that post‐SOX respondents who support the auditor's proposed adjustment have more favorable views of the benefits of SOX, and they believe more strongly that audit committees in the post‐SOX period are more conservative and have more power than they did pre‐SOX. We discuss implications and avenues for future research.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 May 2008
Research Article|
May 01 2008
Audit Committee Member Support for Proposed Audit Adjustments: Pre‐SOX versus Post‐SOX Judgments
F. Todd DeZoort;
F. Todd DeZoort
aProfessor at the University of Alabama.
Search for other works by this author on:
Dana R. Hermanson;
Dana R. Hermanson
bProfessor at Kennesaw State University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard W. Houston
Richard W. Houston
cProfessor at the University of Alabama.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2008
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2008) 27 (1): 85–104.
Citation
F. Todd DeZoort, Dana R. Hermanson, Richard W. Houston; Audit Committee Member Support for Proposed Audit Adjustments: Pre‐SOX versus Post‐SOX Judgments. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 May 2008; 27 (1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.85
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00