This study tests whether prior auditor‐client tenure is associated with the audit fees paid to the successor auditor. In the past, studying the association between tenure with the prior auditor and fees charged by the successor was problematic because of the difficulty in controlling for the causes of the auditor change. However, the collapse of Andersen in late 2002 led to a significant number of exogenous auditor switches. Using a sample of former Andersen clients, our major finding is that audit fees charged by the successor auditor varied positively with the length of the prior auditor's tenure. Given that the audit market is efficient, the observed positive association between current fees and prior auditor tenure suggests to us that successor auditors perceived higher risk from new clients having longer tenure with their previous auditor.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 November 2007
Research Article|
November 01 2007
The Association between Audit‐Firm Tenure and Audit Fees Paid to Successor Auditors: Evidence from Arthur Andersen
Burch T. Kealey;
Burch T. Kealey
aAssociate Professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Search for other works by this author on:
Ho Young Lee;
Ho Young Lee
bProfessor at Yonsei University, at Old Dominion University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael T. Stein
Michael T. Stein
cAssociate Professor at Old Dominion University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2007
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2007) 26 (2): 95–116.
Citation
Burch T. Kealey, Ho Young Lee, Michael T. Stein; The Association between Audit‐Firm Tenure and Audit Fees Paid to Successor Auditors: Evidence from Arthur Andersen. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 November 2007; 26 (2): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.95
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00