The pricing of Big 4 industry leadership is examined for a sample of U.K. publicly‐listed companies, and adds to the evidence from the Australian and U.S. audit markets that city‐specific industry leadership commands a fee premium. There is a significant fee premium for city‐specific industry leaders relative to other Big 4 auditors, but no evidence that either the top‐ranked or second‐ranked firm nationally commands a fee premium relative to other Big 4 auditors, after controlling for city‐level industry leadership. We also test for Big 4 fee premiums relative to non‐Big 4 auditors and the U.K. data suggest a three‐level hierarchy based on audit fee differentials: (1) Big 4 city‐specific industry leaders have the largest fees; (2) other Big 4 auditors (noncity leaders) and second‐tier national firms have comparable fees that are lower than Big 4 city leaders but larger than third‐tier firms; and (3) third‐tier accounting firms have the lowest fees.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.