The pricing of Big 4 industry leadership is examined for a sample of U.K. publicly‐listed companies, and adds to the evidence from the Australian and U.S. audit markets that city‐specific industry leadership commands a fee premium. There is a significant fee premium for city‐specific industry leaders relative to other Big 4 auditors, but no evidence that either the top‐ranked or second‐ranked firm nationally commands a fee premium relative to other Big 4 auditors, after controlling for city‐level industry leadership. We also test for Big 4 fee premiums relative to non‐Big 4 auditors and the U.K. data suggest a three‐level hierarchy based on audit fee differentials: (1) Big 4 city‐specific industry leaders have the largest fees; (2) other Big 4 auditors (noncity leaders) and second‐tier national firms have comparable fees that are lower than Big 4 city leaders but larger than third‐tier firms; and (3) third‐tier accounting firms have the lowest fees.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 November 2007
Research Article|
November 01 2007
Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and Office‐Level Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom
Ilias G. Basioudis;
Ilias G. Basioudis
aSenior Lecturer at Aston University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jere R. Francis
Jere R. Francis
bProfessor at the University of Missouri‐Columbia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2007
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2007) 26 (2): 143–166.
Citation
Ilias G. Basioudis, Jere R. Francis; Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and Office‐Level Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 November 2007; 26 (2): 143–166. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.143
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00