This study examines (1) the association between agency costs and audit‐procurement practices, and (2) the association between audit‐procurement practices, audit quality, and audit fees. Improved audit procurement has been promoted as a mechanism for improving audit quality, particularly in the public sector where auditor moral hazard problems have historically existed. Using a sample of municipal organizations, we find evidence that cities facing higher levels of agency costs, and cities that rely more on their external auditors to relieve such costs, tend to have better‐developed audit‐procurement practices. We also find evidence that well‐developed audit‐procurement practices (and individual audit‐procurement elements), are associated with the hiring of auditors who have higher levels of industry experience—suggestive of higher audit quality. Finally, we find evidence suggesting that well‐developed audit‐procurement practices have a minimal combined effect on audit fees; however, individual audit‐procurement elements are associated with audit fees.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 November 2005
Research Article|
November 01 2005
Audit Procurement: Managing Audit Quality and Audit Fees in Response to Agency Costs
Kevan L. Jensen, Assistant Professor;
Kevan L. Jensen, Assistant Professor
aUniversity of Oklahoma.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeff L. Payne, Associate Professor
Jeff L. Payne, Associate Professor
bUniversity of Kentucky.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2005
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2005) 24 (2): 27–48.
Citation
Kevan L. Jensen, Jeff L. Payne; Audit Procurement: Managing Audit Quality and Audit Fees in Response to Agency Costs. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 November 2005; 24 (2): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.2.27
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00