This study, using data from the Chinese stock market, investigates the relationship between earnings management induced by profitability regulation and modified audit opinions (MAOs). We review recent developments in the accounting profession and in independent auditing to foster an understanding of the environment in which Chinese auditing operates. Based on annual reports published by listed companies from 1995 to 1997, we analyze the underlying reasons for MAOs. Our test results show a significant association between receiving MAOs and reporting profits marginally above the target levels specified in stock de‐listing and rights offering regulations. Our findings are consistent with the notion that asymmetric profitability requirements exacerbate managers' propensity to engage in earnings management, which in turn is positively associated with receiving MAOs. Though based on Chinese data, our findings are of general interest because they address a fundamental issue of trade‐offs between expected costs and expected benefits in deciding whether to avoid MAOs in a transitional economy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2001
Research Article|
September 01 2001
Profitability Regulation, Earnings Management, and Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from China
Charles J. P. Chen, Associate Professor;
Charles J. P. Chen, Associate Professor
aLingnan University, Hong Kong.
Search for other works by this author on:
Shimin Chen, Professor;
Shimin Chen, Professor
aLingnan University, Hong Kong.
Search for other works by this author on:
Xijia Su, Assistant Professor
Xijia Su, Assistant Professor
bCity University of Hong Kong.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2001
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2001) 20 (2): 9–30.
Citation
Charles J. P. Chen, Shimin Chen, Xijia Su; Profitability Regulation, Earnings Management, and Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from China. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 September 2001; 20 (2): 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.9
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00