This paper reports on a study that examines the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors on auditors' inherent risk and control risk assessments in an experimental setting. Two hypotheses concerning the significance of inherent and control risk factors on auditors' inherent risk (IR) and control risk (CR) assessments were tested by having 124 senior auditors and managers provide risk assessments on eight cases. The results show that the pervasive and specific risk factors included in the experiment were significant to both the auditors' IR and CR assessments. For the case used in this study, there was a significant positive association between auditors' IR and CR assessments. Taken together, these findings are consistent with Waller's (1993) notion of a knowledge‐based dependency between IR and CR assessments. The findings are not consistent with Kinney's (1989) reformulation of the (IR×CR) component of the audit risk model.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2000
Research Article|
September 01 2000
Inherent Risk and Control Risk Assessments: Evidence on the Effect of Pervasive and Specific Risk Factors
William F. Messier, Jr., Professor;
William F. Messier, Jr., Professor
aGeorgia State University
Search for other works by this author on:
Lizabeth A. Austen, Assistant Professor
Lizabeth A. Austen, Assistant Professor
bUniversity of Arkansas.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2000
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2000) 19 (2): 119–131.
Citation
William F. Messier, Lizabeth A. Austen; Inherent Risk and Control Risk Assessments: Evidence on the Effect of Pervasive and Specific Risk Factors. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 September 2000; 19 (2): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.119
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00