Audit fees of Big 6 and non‐Big 6 accounting firms are examined for 348 publicly listed Hong Kong companies. Using more recent data than prior studies, we find evidence of Big 6 premiums for both general brand name and for industry specialization. In addition, we find that the large local firm Kwan Wong Tan & Fong, which is the market leader in the property sector, has significantly lower fees than both Big 6 and other non‐Big 6 auditors in that industry. Specialization thus leads to different results for Big 6 and non‐Big 6 firms and suggests a market segment not previously identified: non‐Big 6 specialization, which leads to production economies and the capture of market share through lower fees for a clientele seeking low‐priced audits. These results also suggest that prior studies do not recognize sufficiently that Big 6 brand‐name reputation is a necessary foundation on which to achieve higher priced quality‐differentiated audits based on industry specialization.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 2000
Research Article|
March 01 2000
Auditor Industry Specialization and Market Segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong
Mark L. DeFond, Associate Professor;
Mark L. DeFond, Associate Professor
aUniversity of Southern California.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jere R. Francis, Professor;
Jere R. Francis, Professor
bUniversity of Missouri–Columbia.
Search for other works by this author on:
T. J. Wong, Assistant Professor
T. J. Wong, Assistant Professor
cHong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7991
Print ISSN: 0278-0380
American Accounting Association
2000
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2000) 19 (1): 49–66.
Citation
Mark L. DeFond, Jere R. Francis, T. J. Wong; Auditor Industry Specialization and Market Segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 March 2000; 19 (1): 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.49
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00