This study attempts to examine why western accounting was adopted in one Asian country, Japan, and not in another, China, when modern accounting methods were brought to the East during the mid-19th century. The explanation offered is socio-cultural. China was characterized by centralized political power, a society resistant to change, an anti-merchant policy and narrow-based learning. In contrast, Japan had dispersed structures of political power, a society receptive to change, a pro-merchant policy and broad-based learning. In China, the emphasis was to preserve harmony and integration in accord with mainstream Chinese ideology which had created a highly stable and tradition-oriented society. Chinese enterprises that operated within this institutional framework were unlikely to adopt western-style double-entry bookkeeping. In Japan there was no specifically institutionalized anti-capitalist doctrine to prevent the rise of industrialism and the adoption of modern accounting.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2002
Research Article|
December 01 2002
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACCOUNTING ADAPTATION: CHINA AND JAPAN DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY
Pak K. Auyeung
Pak K. Auyeung
GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
June 01 2001
Revision Received:
March 01 2002
Accepted:
April 01 2002
Online ISSN: 2327-4468
Print ISSN: 0148-4184
© 2002 American Accounting Association
2002
Accounting Historians Journal (2002) 29 (2): 1–30.
Citation
Pak K. Auyeung; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACCOUNTING ADAPTATION: CHINA AND JAPAN DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. Accounting Historians Journal 1 December 2002; 29 (2): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.29.2.1
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00