The archives of the General Mining Association (GMA), a London-based enterprise with substantial holdings in the Nova Scotian coal-mining industry during the 19th century, are investigated in this paper. The historical record was examined with particular reference to the degree to which industrial costing techniques were transplanted via engineers/managers within the British Empire. The findings support the hypothesis that linkages to Newcastle were evident in Canadian coal mining, but that the accounting emphases differed somewhat between the two locales. In Nova Scotia, there was a great attention to day-to-day expense control. A similar concern was apparent also in the North-East of England, but here there appeared the additional sophistications of costing capital improvement projects and estimating the profitability of new workings. With regard to labor, the managers of the GMA's Canadian operations, like their counterparts in the North-East Coalfield, seemed disinterested in tracking the efficiency and productivity of individual miners. We hypothesize that this inattention typified an environment wherein labor was scarce and employment alternatives existed for the work force.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2001
Research Article|
December 01 2001
AN IMPERIAL CONNECTION? CONTRASTING ACCOUNTING PRACTICES IN THE COAL MINES OF NORTH-EAST ENGLAND AND NOVA SCOTIA, 1825–1900
Richard K. Fleischman;
Richard K. Fleischman
JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY
Search for other works by this author on:
David Oldroyd
David Oldroyd
UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
July 01 2000
Revision Received:
March 01 2001
Accepted:
March 01 2001
Online ISSN: 2327-4468
Print ISSN: 0148-4184
© 2001 American Accounting Association
2001
Accounting Historians Journal (2001) 28 (2): 31–62.
Citation
Richard K. Fleischman, David Oldroyd; AN IMPERIAL CONNECTION? CONTRASTING ACCOUNTING PRACTICES IN THE COAL MINES OF NORTH-EAST ENGLAND AND NOVA SCOTIA, 1825–1900. Accounting Historians Journal 1 December 2001; 28 (2): 31–62. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.28.2.31
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00