ABSTRACT: We investigate whether short sellers and analysts differ in their use of information that is predictive of future returns. We find that short interest is significantly associated in the expected direction with all 11 variables examined. In contrast, analysts tend to positively recommend stocks with high growth, high accruals, and low book-to-market ratios, despite these variables having a negative association with future returns. We then investigate the profitability of using short interest in trading. We find abnormal returns (1.11 percent per month) from a zero-investment strategy that (1) shorts firms with highly favorable analyst recommendations (buy signal) but high short interest (sell signal), and (2) buys firms with highly unfavorable analyst recommendations (sell signal) but low short interest (buy signal). Short interest, therefore, appears to capture predictive information that can be used by investors in trading against analysts’ recommendations to increase returns.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 January 2011
Research Article|
January 01 2011
Should Investors Follow the Prophets or the Bears? Evidence on the Use of Public Information by Analysts and Short Sellers
Michael S. Drake;
Michael S. Drake
The Ohio State University
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward P. Swanson
Edward P. Swanson
Texas A&M University
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2011
The Accounting Review (2011) 86 (1): 101–130.
Citation
Michael S. Drake, Lynn Rees, Edward P. Swanson; Should Investors Follow the Prophets or the Bears? Evidence on the Use of Public Information by Analysts and Short Sellers. The Accounting Review 1 January 2011; 86 (1): 101–130. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000006
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00