ABSTRACT: A flourishing stream of research suggests that liquidity-constrained firms with low accounting quality have limited access to capital for investments. We extend this research by investigating whether these firms are more likely to lease their assets. Lessors’ superior control rights allow them to provide capital to constrained firms with low-quality accounting reports. Consistent with this conjecture, we find that low accounting quality firms have a higher propensity to lease than purchase assets. To verify that leasing does not merely reflect these firms’ desire for off-balance-sheet accounting, we investigate whether banks’ access to private information and monitoring affect the relation between accounting quality and leasing. We find the association between accounting quality and leasing decreases when banks have higher monitoring incentives and when loans contain capital expenditure provisions. These results suggest that other mechanisms can substitute for the role of accounting quality in reducing information problems.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 2010
Research Article|
July 01 2010
Financial Reporting Quality, Private Information, Monitoring, and the Lease-versus-Buy Decision
Joseph Weber
Joseph Weber
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2010
The Accounting Review (2010) 85 (4): 1215–1238.
Citation
Anne Beatty, Scott Liao, Joseph Weber; Financial Reporting Quality, Private Information, Monitoring, and the Lease-versus-Buy Decision. The Accounting Review 1 July 2010; 85 (4): 1215–1238. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1215
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00