ABSTRACT: Larger offices of Big 4 auditors are predicted to have higher quality audits for SEC registrants due to greater in‐house experience in administering such audits. We test this prediction by examining a sample of 6,568 U.S. firm‐year observations for the period 2003–2005 and audited by 285 unique Big 4 offices. Results are consistent with larger offices providing higher quality audits. Specifically, larger offices are more likely to issue going‐concern audit reports, and clients in larger offices evidence less aggressive earnings management behavior. These findings are robust to extensive controls for client risk factors and to controls for other auditor characteristics. While the evidence suggests audit quality is higher on average in larger Big 4 offices, we make no claims that audit quality is unacceptably low in smaller offices.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2009
Research Article|
September 01 2009
Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality
Jere R. Francis;
Jere R. Francis
University of Missouri–Columbia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael D. Yu
Michael D. Yu
Washington State University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2009
The Accounting Review (2009) 84 (5): 1521–1552.
Citation
Jere R. Francis, Michael D. Yu; Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 1 September 2009; 84 (5): 1521–1552. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00