ABSTRACT: We study the effects of cross‐listings on audit fees. We first develop a model in which legal environments play a crucial role in determining the auditor's legal liability. Our model and analysis predict that auditors charge higher fees for firms that are cross‐listed in countries with stronger legal regimes than they do for non‐cross‐listed firms and that the cross‐listing audit fee premium increases with the difference in the strength of legal regimes between the cross‐listed foreign country and the home country. We then empirically test these predictions. The results of our cross‐country regressions strongly support our predictions. In addition, we find no significant cross‐listing fee premium for firms that are cross‐listed in countries whose legal regimes are. no stronger than those of their home countries. This suggests that cross‐listing audit fee premiums are associated with increased legal liability and not with increased audit complexity per se. Our findings help explain why cross‐listing premiums occur and what determines their magnitude.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2009
Research Article|
September 01 2009
Cross‐Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence
Jeong‐Bon Kim;
Jeong‐Bon Kim
Concordia University and City University of Hong Kong.
Search for other works by this author on:
Dan A. Simunic
Dan A. Simunic
The University of British Columbia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2009
The Accounting Review (2009) 84 (5): 1429–1463.
Citation
Jong‐Hag Choi, Jeong‐Bon Kim, Xiaohong Liu, Dan A. Simunic; Cross‐Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence. The Accounting Review 1 September 2009; 84 (5): 1429–1463. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1429
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00