In this study, we document evidence on the relation between auditor tenure and earnings quality using the dispersion and sign of both absolute Jones‐model abnormal accruals and absolute current accruals as proxies for earnings quality. Our study is motivated by calls for “mandatory auditor rotation,” which are based on concerns that longer auditor tenure reduces earnings quality. Multivariate results, controlling for firm age, size, industry growth, cash flows, auditor type (Big N versus non‐Big N), industry, and year, generally suggest higher earnings quality with longer auditor tenure. We interpret our results as suggesting that, in the current environment, longer auditor tenure, on average, results in auditors placing greater constraints on extreme management decisions in the reporting of financial performance.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 2003
Research Article|
July 01 2003
Exploring the Term of the Auditor‐Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?
James N. Myers;
James N. Myers
aUniversity of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign.
Search for other works by this author on:
Linda A. Myers;
Linda A. Myers
aUniversity of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign.
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas C. Omer
Thomas C. Omer
bUniversity of Illinois at Chicago.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2003
The Accounting Review (2003) 78 (3): 779–799.
Citation
James N. Myers, Linda A. Myers, Thomas C. Omer; Exploring the Term of the Auditor‐Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?. The Accounting Review 1 July 2003; 78 (3): 779–799. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00