Drawing on theories from operations, management, and marketing, this paper examines whether three types of measurement alternatives affect the forwardlooking properties of a quality measure. Using proprietary data from a medical services firm, the results show that the strength of the relation between a current quality measure and future quality‐related warranty costs depends on: (1) the standard against which quality is measured, (2) assumptions regarding the relation's symmetry, and (3) assumptions regarding the relation's functional form. Thus, the construction of a quality performance measure may improve its ability to predict future financial performance and, hence, its usefulness for decision making and control. The paper concludes with an illustration of how firms can use a contemporaneous and forward‐looking quality measure to assess quality‐related decisions in a timely manner and shows that those decisions can be affected by the measurement alternatives examined.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 April 2003
Research Article|
April 01 2003
The Effect of Measurement Alternatives on a Nonfinancial Quality Measure's Forward‐Looking Properties
Karen L. Sedatole
Karen L. Sedatole
The University of Texas at Austin.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7967
Print ISSN: 0001-4826
American Accounting Association
2003
The Accounting Review (2003) 78 (2): 555–580.
Citation
Karen L. Sedatole; The Effect of Measurement Alternatives on a Nonfinancial Quality Measure's Forward‐Looking Properties. The Accounting Review 1 April 2003; 78 (2): 555–580. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.555
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00