The IASB and ASBJ Conceptual Frameworks: Same Objective, Different Financial Performance Concepts | Citedby Results | Accounting Horizons | American Accounting Association

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

The IASB and ASBJ Conceptual Frameworks: Same Objective, Different Financial Performance Concepts

Accounting Horizons (2015) 29 (1): 199–216.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Accounting for Uncertainty

Stephen Penman

Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium (2024) 14 (3): 309.

Using arguments and myths to lobby over controversial accounting issues: evidence from Japan

Noriyuki Tsunogaya
Andreas Hellmann

Pacific Accounting Review (2020) 32 (3): 355.

The Return of Stewardship, Reliability and Prudence – A Commentary on the IASB’s New Conceptual Framework

Christoph Pelger

Accounting in Europe (2020) 17 (1): 33.

Whither the Concept of Income?

Shizuki Saito
Yoshitaka Fukui

Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium (2019) 9 (1)

Articulation, Profit or Loss and OCI in the IASB Conceptual Framework: Different Shades of Clean (or Dirty) Surplus

Carien van Mourik
Yuko Katsuo Asami

Accounting in Europe (2018) 15 (2): 167.

Accounting Conceptual Frameworks: Masb vs. Aaoifi

Zulkarnain Muhamad Sori

SSRN Electronic Journal (2017)

Does recycling improve information usefulness of income? The case of Japan

HU Dan Semba

Asian Review of Accounting (2017) 25 (3): 376.

From compromise to concept? – a review of ‘other comprehensive income’

Dominic Detzen

Accounting and Business Research (2016) 46 (7): 760.

Conservatism as a Defining Principle for Accounting

Stephen Penman

The Japanese Accounting Review (2016) 6 (2016): 1.

Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2015 academic literature

Stephen R. Moehrle
Laurel Franzen
Michele Meckfessel
Jennifer Reynolds-Moehrle

Research in Accounting Regulation (2016) 28 (2): 96.