Tax Professionals' Responsibility for Fraud Detection: The Effects of Engagement Type and Audit Status | Citedby Results | Accounting Horizons | American Accounting Association

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Tax Professionals' Responsibility for Fraud Detection: The Effects of Engagement Type and Audit Status

Accounting Horizons (2012) 26 (2): 289–306.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

An evaluation of tax fraud cases limited by fiscal control in Algeria 2007–2013

Brahim Blaha
Benabbou Senouci

The Journal of North African Studies (2023) 28 (1): 133.

Understanding Auditors’ Sense of Responsibility for Detecting Fraud Within Organizations

F. Todd DeZoort
Paul D. Harrison

Journal of Business Ethics (2018) 149 (4): 857.

Survey of Skills Required by the Forensic Accountants: Evidence from a Developing Country

Madan Bhasin

SSRN Electronic Journal (2015)

Characteristics of companies with a higher risk of financial statement fraud: Five case studies

Elda du Toit
Frans N.S. Vermaak

Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions (2015) 5 (1): 77.

The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments

Douglas M. Boyle
F. Todd DeZoort
Dana R. Hermanson

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (2015) 34 (6): 578.

Survey of Appropriate Skills Required by Forensic Accountants: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Economy

Madan Bhasin

SSRN Electronic Journal (2015)

An Emperical Investigation of the Relevant Skills of Forensic Accountants: Experience of a Developing Economy

Madan Bhasin

SSRN Electronic Journal (2015)

INTERNAL CONTROL AND FRAUD PREVENTION: PRIOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS

Stacey Mirinaviciene

Science and Studies of Accounting and Finance: Problems and Perspectives (2014) 9 (1): 173.