SYNOPSIS: Studying the determinants of management forecast precision is important because a better understanding of the factors affecting management’s choice of forecast precision can provide investors and other users with cues about the characteristics of the information contained in the forecasts. In addition, as regulators assess the regulation of voluntary management disclosures, they need to better understand how managers choose among forecast precision disclosure alternatives. Using 16,872 management earnings forecasts collected from 1995 through 2004, we provide strong evidence that forecast precision is negatively associated with the magnitude of the forecast surprise and that this negative association is stronger when the forecast is bad news than when it is good news. We also find that forecast precision is negatively associated with the absolute magnitude of the forecast error that proxies for the forecast uncertainty that managers face when they issue forecasts, and that the negative association is stronger when forecast errors are negative. These results are consistent with greater liability concerns related to bad news forecasts and negative forecast errors, respectively. Our study provides educators and researchers with important insights into management’s choice of earnings forecast precision, which is a component of the voluntary disclosure process that is not well understood.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 June 2010
Research Article|
June 01 2010
The Roles that Forecast Surprise and Forecast Error Play in Determining Management Forecast Precision
Online ISSN: 1558-7975
Print ISSN: 0888-7993
American Accounting Association
2010
Accounting Horizons (2010) 24 (2): 165–188.
Citation
Jong-Hag Choi, Linda A. Myers, Yoonseok Zang, David A. Ziebart; The Roles that Forecast Surprise and Forecast Error Play in Determining Management Forecast Precision. Accounting Horizons 1 June 2010; 24 (2): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.165
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00