In this paper, we investigate the change in managerial discretion over financial reporting following the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (hereafter SOX). We document an increase in conservatism in financial reporting following SOX and the resulting requirement by the SEC that financial statements be certified by firms' CEOs and CFOs. First, we find that firms report lower discretionary accruals after SOX than in the period preceding SOX. Second, based on the Basu (1997) measure of conservatism, we find that firms incorporate losses more quickly than gains when they report income in the post‐SOX period. These results are obtained with alternative estimation and measurement approaches and after controlling for potentially confounding variables. This empirical evidence suggests that SOX and the resultant SEC certification requirement may have altered management's discretionary reporting behavior to make it more conservative.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 2006
Research Article|
March 01 2006
Did Conservatism in Financial Reporting Increase after the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act? Initial Evidence
Gerald J. Lobo, Professor;
Gerald J. Lobo, Professor
University of Houston.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jian Zhou, Assistant Professor
Jian Zhou, Assistant Professor
University of New York at Binghamton.
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1558-7975
Print ISSN: 0888-7993
American Accounting Association
2006
Accounting Horizons (2006) 20 (1): 57–73.
Citation
Gerald J. Lobo, Jian Zhou; Did Conservatism in Financial Reporting Increase after the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act? Initial Evidence. Accounting Horizons 1 March 2006; 20 (1): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.57
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00